Internet-Draft 8717update April 2025
Salz Expires 3 October 2025 [Page]
Workgroup:
TBD
Internet-Draft:
draft-rsalz-8717-update-01
Updates:
3710, 3929, 4633, 6702, 9281 (if approved)
Published:
Intended Status:
Best Current Practice
Expires:
Author:
R. Salz
Akamai Technologies

Update to RFC 8717: IETF Administrative Terminology

Abstract

RFC 8717 updated several RFCs pertaining to the organization of the IETF to use the term "Managing Director, IETF Secretariat" (MDS). As that term does not accurately reflect the organization or roles of the IETF staff, the MDS term is no longer relevant. This document removes mention of particular staff roles, and instead updates the source documents so that the job to be done, and who the responsible entity is, are described.

Discussion Venues

This note is to be removed before publishing as an RFC.

Source for this draft and an issue tracker can be found at https://github.com/richsalz/draft-8717-update.

Status of This Memo

This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.

Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-Drafts is at https://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.

Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."

This Internet-Draft will expire on 3 October 2025.

Table of Contents

1. Introduction

[RFC8717] updated several RFCs pertaining to the organization of the IETF to use the term "Managing Director, IETF Secretariat" (MDS). As that term does not accurately reflect the organization or roles of the IETF staff, the MDS term is no longer relevant. This document removes mention of particular staff roles, and instead updates the source documents so that the job to done, and who the responsible entity is, are described.

This document updates [RFC3710] and [RFC6702]. It also changes the status of [RFC3929] and [RFC4633] to Historic.

2. Conventions and Definitions

The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT", "SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all capitals, as shown here.

3. Updates Being Made

[RFC8717], Section 2 explained that [RFC2606] did not need to be updated because [RFC8179] removed the need for it. While the same section of RFC 8717 provided an update to [RFC2028], that has similarly been overtaken by events in that it was obsoleted by [RFC9281], and Section 3 of RFC 9281 does not need revising.

Further, the IETF is in the "consideration" stage of forming a working group to update [RFC2418]; for discussion, see the mailing list. An online document proposing changes to RFC 2418 to comply with this document are available.

The following sub-sections make the specific changes for each RFC and therefore this document completely replaces Section 2 of RFC 8717.

3.1. Changes to RFC 3710

[RFC3710], Section 2 describes the composition of the IESG and mentions the IETF Executive Director twice.

The first mention:

The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Chair and the IETF Executive
Director, as ex-officio members of the IESG.

Is replaced with the following text:

The Internet Architecture Board (IAB) Chair and the IETF Executive
Director or their designee, as ex-officio members of the IESG.

The second mention:

The IETF Executive Director is the person charged with running the
IETF Secretariat.

is deleted.

3.2. Changes to RFC 3929

[RFC3929] is an Experimental RFC published in 2004. This document changes its status to Historic.

3.3. Changes to RFC 4633

[RFC4633] is an Experimental RFC published in 2006. This document changes its status to Historic.

3.4. Changes to RFC 6702

[RFC6702], Section 5 says that WG Chairs and Area Directors are encouraged to ask the IETF Executive Directory to contact those who submitted an early intellectual property disclosure and request an update. This document specifies an email address to be used for that purpose:

To help prevent early IPR disclosures from becoming stale
or incomplete, at important junctures in the standardization process
(e.g., at working group adoption, before Working Group Last Call, and
before IETF Last Call) WG chairs and ADs are encouraged to request
that the Executive Director of the IETF contact those who submitted
early IPR disclosures about updating their disclosures by
sending email to XXX@ietf.org.

4. Security Considerations

This document has no security considerations.

5. IANA Considerations

This document has no IANA actions.

6. References

6.1. Normative References

[RFC2119]
Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2119>.
[RFC3710]
Alvestrand, H., "An IESG charter", RFC 3710, DOI 10.17487/RFC3710, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3710>.
[RFC3929]
Hardie, T., "Alternative Decision Making Processes for Consensus-Blocked Decisions in the IETF", RFC 3929, DOI 10.17487/RFC3929, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc3929>.
[RFC4633]
Hartman, S., "Experiment in Long-Term Suspensions From Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) Mailing Lists", RFC 4633, DOI 10.17487/RFC4633, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc4633>.
[RFC6702]
Polk, T. and P. Saint-Andre, "Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules", RFC 6702, DOI 10.17487/RFC6702, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc6702>.
[RFC8174]
Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC 2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8174>.
[RFC8717]
Klensin, J., Ed., "IETF Administrative Support Activity 2.0: Consolidated Updates to IETF Administrative Terminology", BCP 101, RFC 8717, DOI 10.17487/RFC8717, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8717>.

6.2. Informative References

[RFC2028]
Hovey, R. and S. Bradner, "The Organizations Involved in the IETF Standards Process", RFC 2028, DOI 10.17487/RFC2028, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2028>.
[RFC2418]
Bradner, S., "IETF Working Group Guidelines and Procedures", BCP 25, RFC 2418, DOI 10.17487/RFC2418, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2418>.
[RFC2606]
Eastlake 3rd, D. and A. Panitz, "Reserved Top Level DNS Names", BCP 32, RFC 2606, DOI 10.17487/RFC2606, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2606>.
[RFC8179]
Bradner, S. and J. Contreras, "Intellectual Property Rights in IETF Technology", BCP 79, RFC 8179, DOI 10.17487/RFC8179, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8179>.
[RFC9281]
Salz, R., "Entities Involved in the IETF Standards Process", BCP 11, RFC 9281, DOI 10.17487/RFC9281, , <https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc9281>.

Acknowledgments

Just me.

Author's Address

Rich Salz
Akamai Technologies