IPFC WG Summaries: 1 . Agenda for the meeting was discussed. - Status of drafts - Presentation of the Management MIB by Steve Blumenau - Next Steps 2. Status of the Framework Work - draft-ietf-ipfc-mib-framework 03.txt currently being considered for publication as a Informational RFC by ADs. Eric Nordmark said that the draft has to be edited to make it more useful as a Framework document and in the current state seemed unacceptable. Mark Carlson readily agreed to fix this and resubmit the next level draft before the March meeting. 3. Status and Presentation of Fabric Management MIB: Steven Blumenau, EMC Corp. Steve indicated that the latest draft 05.txt marked the completion of the MIB work. Steve (see attachment) gave a high level overview of the MIB. There were couple of minor changes requested of Steve by Kevin Gibbons (Nishan) and Staish Mali (StoneFly). Steve indicated that he will reflect these changesin the next 06.txt draft. Steve said that the 06.txt draft is expected to bethe final draft before the last call. 4. Murali Rajagopal next said that next step was to get the Framework and the Fabic Management drafts out before the next meet. (see attachment) Further, he said that the WG would then have fulfilled its original charter goals. So far the WG has produced 2 Standard Track RFCs and is expected to produce 1 more Standard Strack (Fabric Mgmt) and 1 Informational (Framework MIB) . Murali also said that taking RFC 2625 to the next step has not happebned for several reasons. One the UNH reports had to be somewhat confidential and we could not disclose exactly which vendor supported what. Second, due to changes in jobs of several people involved, there has been problem regarding resources. However, he indicated that he would give it one more try before the next meet. The WG adjourned with the view that this was most likely no need to meet face-to-face again. The remiander of the work could be handled by email.