Minutes, CONNEG Working Group Dec 13, 1998 Ted Hardie, Chair Reported by April Marine The chair first clarified the focus of the group for first time attendees, highlighting its mission to create a registry for elements of exchange and a syntax for senders and recipients to use in identifying the intersection of capabilities and available features. Graham Klyne reviewed the current syntax docs. Recent issues on the mailing list have focused on q-values and set notation; those and editorial changes were considered and the room approved of the proposed changes. These will be folded into a final draft and that draft will be last called on the mailing list. During the course of discussion, two architectural principles for registered features emerged. The first principle is that the semantics of a feature should not depend on the value of any other feature. For example, if you have a feature "cloth" which can be equal to "cotton", "wool", or "blend" and second feature "washtemp" which can be equal to "hot", "cold", or "warm", the values of "hot" should not change in a washing context depending on the cloth chosen. The related architectural principle is that absolutely determined features make it easier to reuse the same terms independently; "washtemp", in other words, should be the temperature in degrees celsius, not tokens like "hot", "warm", and "cold". The group briefly considered the CCPP crosswalk draft and noted that the primary difference between the frameworks is that the CCPP draft presumes an aggregated feature set based on device; the CONNEG framework presumes that feature sets get built out of individual feature collections at the time of exchange. The two groups have agreed to use the same uri syntax for uri-based features; the CCPP may eventual use registered feature sets, when they have been fully specified. Larry Masinter presented a possible resolution to the color issue in the media-features draft; he will issue a new draft, which will be last called on the list. The group recognizes that this document is not meant to be comprehensive, but merely a basic set of useful media features; the color model and other aspects here are, therefore necessarily limited. The group heard a presentation from Lloyd McIntyre and Graham Klyne on the FAX feature document; this is being considered in the FAX working group and those interested in that arena should follow the document there. Some final questions on IANA considerations were discussed and Larry Masinter identified as an Area Expert for the IANA to consult in the area of feature collections. Further work on feature set aggregation is needed; Chris Burke has tenatively volunteered to edit that draft. 2/28/99 set as a potential date for that work.