Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:31 pm
fsmithred wrote:Yes, the logo at the bottom looks good for a desktop background.
fsmithred wrote:Translucent vs. opaque on the new refracta logo in the desktop background image.
fsmithred wrote:Darker white in the text areas of the web pages. Nothing to do with logo. Or maybe I don't understand what you're asking.
Thu Feb 21, 2013 4:53 pm
nadir wrote:Sorry, no kidding, but i am a bit confused by all those links.
nadir wrote:btw, but i am not able to navigate to any sites (if you mean refracat-release-notes-7.0 at saynotogmos
Thu Feb 21, 2013 6:45 pm
Thu Feb 21, 2013 7:22 pm
fsmithred wrote:Logo - I like the old way better. Rotated version looks like a guy falling over and makes me nervous.
fsmithred wrote:Solid color vs. tiled - It's not clear to me what is tiled or where, but on the tiled version, the white looks slightly blue and a little darker than in the sold version. I like the tiled better for that reason.
Thu Feb 21, 2013 9:46 pm
nadir wrote:2) team and such (footer): I meant to add your name somewhere as the one who has worked on the web-page (I proposed either the team-page or the footer or both).
Fri Feb 22, 2013 4:16 am
Fri Feb 22, 2013 2:15 pm
Fri Feb 22, 2013 3:52 pm
fsmithred wrote:Something like "web design by golinux" (or whoever you want to be) at the bottom of the page is appropriate. If you're a professional web designer, then that's free advertising. (And thanks much for the free work.)
fsmithred wrote:The repeating tile makes sense to me now. I did what you suggested with the color picker.
Fri Feb 22, 2013 8:04 pm
Sat Feb 23, 2013 1:16 am